Prediction of Claire Beckingham vs Lucy Bond Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Wojtek Kolan

HEAD TO HEAD

C. Beckingham vs L. Bond

Claire Beckingham
Claire Beckingham

Flag GBR GBR

w
w
w
l
w
w
w
w
l
l
Lucy Bond
Lucy Bond

Flag GBR GBR

l
w
l
l
l
w
l
w
w
l

0

Win

0

Played

0

Win

0
Age
121
-
Height
-
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Head-to-head: Beckingham 0 - 0 Bond

They have played 2 sets in total, with Claire Beckingham winning 2 and Lucy Bond winning 0. The last match between Claire Beckingham and Lucy Bond was at the Felixstowe East England Chps, 06-07-1925, Round: , Surface: N/A, with Claire Beckingham getting the victory 6-2 6-0.

PlayersHead To Head Match Wins
Beckingham0
Bond0
Last 1 H2H Matches:

(Felixstowe East England Chps(07-06-25)

N/A
GBR Flag
Claire Beckingham
6
6
GBR Flag
Lucy Bond
2
0

C. Beckingham vs L. Bond H2H Profile

Stats
$0Career Prize Money$0
69.89% (195-84)Career Total W/L46.97% (31-35)
0% (0-0)YTD Win/Loss0% (0-0)

C. Beckingham vs L. Bond Match Preview:

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Claire Beckingham has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Lucy Bond has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Claire Beckingham, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Lucy Bond has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Claire Beckingham has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lucy Bond has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Claire Beckingham has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Lucy Bond winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Claire Beckingham has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 72% (W/L 23/9), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 70/34). Lucy Bond has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 72% (W/L 12/8), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 39% (W/L 9/14).
  • Player level: In the last year, Claire Beckingham has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Lucy Bond has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Claire Beckingham winning 1 times and Lucy Bond being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Claire Beckingham winning 2 and Lucy Bond winning 0.
  • The last match between Claire Beckingham and Lucy Bond was at the Felixstowe East England Chps, 06-07-1925, Round: , Surface: N/A, with Claire Beckingham getting the victory 6-2 6-0.
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Claire Beckingham has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Lucy Bond has played against players with an average rank of 0.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Claire Beckingham has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lucy Bond has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Claire Beckingham has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lucy Bond has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Claire Beckingham vs Lucy Bond Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

C. Beckingham vs L. Bond H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Stats
1H2H Matches Won0
2Sets Won0
12Games Won2
0:0:0Average Match Time0:0:0
100% (1/1)Best‑of‑3 Win %0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)1st Set Won, Won Match0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)1st Set Won, Lost Match0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)1st Set Lost, Won Match0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

2nd Serve Win %: Beckingham 0%, Bond 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Beckingham 0%, Bond 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Beckingham 0%, Bond 0%.

C. Beckingham Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
CarpetQueens Indoors - 15-10-1928

R3

GBRJ. Marshall
L
W/O
ClayNewcastle Hard - 09-10-1928

R3

GBRN. Hellewell
W
6-2 4-6 6-1

F

GBRJ. Fry
L
6-4 6-0

SF

GBRB. Dix
W
6-1 6-4

GBRM. E
W
4-6 7-5 11-9

L. Bond Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
GrassFelixstowe - 10-07-1939

R4

GBRM. Harris
L
6-1 6-1
N/AFelixstowe East England - 05-07-1937

GBRE. Pittman
L
3-6 6-1 6-4

R4

GBRM. Harris
W
0-6 6-4 6-4

R3

GBRM. R
W
6-3 6-0
N/AFelixstowe 2 - 08-10-1934

R4

GBRJ. Ridley
L
6-3 6-3
banner

C. Beckingham vs L. Bond Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

Stats
69.89% (195/84)YTD Win/Loss46.97% (31/35)
65.42% (401/212)Sets Win/Loss44.37% (63/79)
57.05% (3168/2385)Games Win/Loss46.90% (613/694)
67.31% (70/34)Clay Win/Loss43.48% (10/13)
50.00% (3/3)Indoor Hard W/L0% (0/0)
72.26% (99/38)Grass Win/Loss39.13% (9/14)
1st MatchAverage Match Time1st Match
45.45% (5/6)Slam W/L0% (0/0)
69% (186/269)Best of 3 Sets Win %46% (30/65)
63% (46/73)Deciding Set Win %75% (9/12)
94% (174/164)1st Set Won, Won Match93% (28/26)
6% (174/10)1st Set Won, Lost Match7% (28/2)
25% (97/24)1st Set Lost, Won Match11% (37/4)

Other Tennis Predictions Today

Fri, 21 Nov, 12:05 PM
Prediction
NEDJ. Sels6
GBRC. RobertsonJR
W1
1.4
W2
2.68
Fri, 21 Nov, 08:00 PM
Prediction
ECUA. Andrade9
ARGF. A. Gomez8
W1
2.13
W2
1.62
Fri, 21 Nov, 04:00 PM
Prediction
GBRA. Gray1
GERS. Fanselowq
W1
1.165
W2
4.4
Fri, 21 Nov, 04:00 PM
Prediction
CHIB. Torres
MEXR. Alujas2
W1
3.84
W2
1.21
Sat, 22 Nov, 05:00 AM
Prediction
JPNK. Uchida8
BRAI. R. Marcondesq
W1
1.81
W2
1.87
Fri, 21 Nov, 12:35 PM
Prediction
ESPJ. Plans8
KAZA. OmarkhanovJR
W1
1.63
W2
2.11